Review




Structured Review

Addgene inc lrp6
A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or <t>LRP6-Venus</t> with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.
Lrp6, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 11 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lrp6/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 11 article reviews
lrp6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling"

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

Journal: Nature Communications

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or LRP6-Venus with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.
Figure Legend Snippet: A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or LRP6-Venus with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.

Techniques Used: Construct, FLAG-tag, Transfection, Phospho-proteomics

A Schematic depiction of mutational paradigms. The FZD 5 R 6.32 A mutants preferentially signals in DVL-independent fashion. The DVL2 M2/M4 mutant cannot polymerize by its DIX domains. The DVL2 L445E mutant cannot engage FZD via its DEP domain. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/zfu7r84 . B ΔBRET traces of HEK293 cells transfected either with WT FZD 5 -Nluc or FZD 5 R 6.32 A-Nluc (dark and light blue circles, respectively) and LRP6-Venus, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. C ΔBRET traces of HEK293 and HEK293T ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (green and black circles), DVL2 (cyan and magenta), or DVL2-M2/M4 (dark cyan and purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. D ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL1 (green), DVL2 (magenta), or DVL3 (purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. E ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL2 (magenta), DVL2-M2/M4 (purple), DVL2-L445E (orange), or DVL2-M2/M4-L445E (red) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. F Scheme illustrating a proposed mechanism of DVL modulation of WNT-induced FZD 5 -LRP6 interaction. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/3gct1ez . Data are shown as mea n ± SEM of three (B – FZD 5 R 6.32 A, C – data with DVL2-M2/M4 co-expression D, E) or four (B – wt FZD 5 , C – all other data) individual experiments performed in triplicate. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.
Figure Legend Snippet: A Schematic depiction of mutational paradigms. The FZD 5 R 6.32 A mutants preferentially signals in DVL-independent fashion. The DVL2 M2/M4 mutant cannot polymerize by its DIX domains. The DVL2 L445E mutant cannot engage FZD via its DEP domain. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/zfu7r84 . B ΔBRET traces of HEK293 cells transfected either with WT FZD 5 -Nluc or FZD 5 R 6.32 A-Nluc (dark and light blue circles, respectively) and LRP6-Venus, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. C ΔBRET traces of HEK293 and HEK293T ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (green and black circles), DVL2 (cyan and magenta), or DVL2-M2/M4 (dark cyan and purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. D ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL1 (green), DVL2 (magenta), or DVL3 (purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. E ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL2 (magenta), DVL2-M2/M4 (purple), DVL2-L445E (orange), or DVL2-M2/M4-L445E (red) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. F Scheme illustrating a proposed mechanism of DVL modulation of WNT-induced FZD 5 -LRP6 interaction. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/3gct1ez . Data are shown as mea n ± SEM of three (B – FZD 5 R 6.32 A, C – data with DVL2-M2/M4 co-expression D, E) or four (B – wt FZD 5 , C – all other data) individual experiments performed in triplicate. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Techniques Used: Mutagenesis, Transfection, Expressing

A–D Kinetic ΔBRET traces of 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A ( A ), -5A ( B ), -10B ( C ), and -16B ( D ) at FZD 4,5,7 -Nluc (purple, red, and green, respectively) and LRP6-Venus. E Immunoblotting of phospho-LRP6, β-catenin, DVL2 and GAPDH (loading control) from whole cell lysates of HEK cells, stimulated for 2 h with 300 ng/ml of WNT-3A, -5A, -10B, and -16B or 1 nM surrogate WNT. The vehicle control (VC) was treated with HBSS and a CHAPS/EDTA mixture corresponding to that present in WNT preparations. F , G Densitometric analysis ( F , ratio of phospho-LRP6 (P-LRP6)/GAPDH; G , ratio of phosphorylated and shifted (PS-DVL2/DVL2) of blots shown in E. VC – black circle outlines, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. H . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 and HEK293T ΔFZD 1-10 cells overexpressing FZD 4/5/7 stimulated with diverse WNTs (300 ng/ml for 24 h) or WNT surrogate (1 nM for 24 h). The TOPFlash ratio is given as a fold-increase over vehicle control; statistical analysis was performed with one-way-ANOVA versus vehicle control for each transfection condition. WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. I . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 cells stimulated with R-spondin 1 (RSPO1; 100 ng/ml), WNT-3A (300 ng/ml), WNT-16B (300 ng/ml), and WNT-R-spondin 1 combinations for 24 h. Vehicle – black circle outlines, R-spondin 1 – blue-gray, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-16B – purple, WNT-3A + R-spondin 1 – light blue, WNT-16B + R-spondin 1 – pink. Statistical significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA using Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons against the vehicle control (reporter gene assay data was log 10 -transformed prior to statistical analysis). Data points are shown as mea n ± SEM of three individual experiments ( n = 4 in Fid. 2 C, D for FZD 5 data and in Fig. for FZD 7 TOPFlash data), performed in triplicate in case of BRET assays and reporter gene assays. Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.
Figure Legend Snippet: A–D Kinetic ΔBRET traces of 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A ( A ), -5A ( B ), -10B ( C ), and -16B ( D ) at FZD 4,5,7 -Nluc (purple, red, and green, respectively) and LRP6-Venus. E Immunoblotting of phospho-LRP6, β-catenin, DVL2 and GAPDH (loading control) from whole cell lysates of HEK cells, stimulated for 2 h with 300 ng/ml of WNT-3A, -5A, -10B, and -16B or 1 nM surrogate WNT. The vehicle control (VC) was treated with HBSS and a CHAPS/EDTA mixture corresponding to that present in WNT preparations. F , G Densitometric analysis ( F , ratio of phospho-LRP6 (P-LRP6)/GAPDH; G , ratio of phosphorylated and shifted (PS-DVL2/DVL2) of blots shown in E. VC – black circle outlines, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. H . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 and HEK293T ΔFZD 1-10 cells overexpressing FZD 4/5/7 stimulated with diverse WNTs (300 ng/ml for 24 h) or WNT surrogate (1 nM for 24 h). The TOPFlash ratio is given as a fold-increase over vehicle control; statistical analysis was performed with one-way-ANOVA versus vehicle control for each transfection condition. WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. I . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 cells stimulated with R-spondin 1 (RSPO1; 100 ng/ml), WNT-3A (300 ng/ml), WNT-16B (300 ng/ml), and WNT-R-spondin 1 combinations for 24 h. Vehicle – black circle outlines, R-spondin 1 – blue-gray, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-16B – purple, WNT-3A + R-spondin 1 – light blue, WNT-16B + R-spondin 1 – pink. Statistical significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA using Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons against the vehicle control (reporter gene assay data was log 10 -transformed prior to statistical analysis). Data points are shown as mea n ± SEM of three individual experiments ( n = 4 in Fid. 2 C, D for FZD 5 data and in Fig. for FZD 7 TOPFlash data), performed in triplicate in case of BRET assays and reporter gene assays. Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Techniques Used: Western Blot, Control, Transfection, Reporter Gene Assay, Transformation Assay

A . Representative single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (left) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (right). B . Single-molecule trajectory traces of SNAP-FZD 5 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 (green). C . Proportion of molecular confinement at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. D . Estimated k on (left) and k off (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6 interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. E . Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulated conditions. F . Representative, dual-color single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. G . Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. (C-E) Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n = 18, 25, 22, 17, 27, 25 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6 basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, WNT-16B early, WNT-16B late, and β 2 AR-LRP6, respectively, from six independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies - . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.
Figure Legend Snippet: A . Representative single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (left) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (right). B . Single-molecule trajectory traces of SNAP-FZD 5 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 (green). C . Proportion of molecular confinement at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. D . Estimated k on (left) and k off (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6 interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. E . Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulated conditions. F . Representative, dual-color single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. G . Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. (C-E) Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n = 18, 25, 22, 17, 27, 25 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6 basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, WNT-16B early, WNT-16B late, and β 2 AR-LRP6, respectively, from six independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies - . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Techniques Used: Labeling, Diffusion-based Assay, Comparison

A Proportion of SNAP-FZD 5 and Halo-LRP6-5A molecular confinement at basal (black) and following 100 nM WNT-3A (early – light blue, late – dark blue) stimulation. B Representative, dual-color single-molecule image showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6-5A molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. C . Estimated kon (left) and koff (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6-5A interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation (early – light blue, late – dark blue). D Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A stimulated conditions. E Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. A , C , D Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test ( A , D ) and Mann-Whitney test C . n = 21, 26, 32 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6-5A basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, respectively, from three independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies – . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.
Figure Legend Snippet: A Proportion of SNAP-FZD 5 and Halo-LRP6-5A molecular confinement at basal (black) and following 100 nM WNT-3A (early – light blue, late – dark blue) stimulation. B Representative, dual-color single-molecule image showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6-5A molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. C . Estimated kon (left) and koff (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6-5A interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation (early – light blue, late – dark blue). D Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A stimulated conditions. E Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. A , C , D Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test ( A , D ) and Mann-Whitney test C . n = 21, 26, 32 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6-5A basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, respectively, from three independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies – . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Techniques Used: Labeling, Diffusion-based Assay, Comparison, MANN-WHITNEY

A Direct comparison of the effects of WNT-3A and WNT-16B as probed in this study. B Two-step model of signal initiation and specification in WNT/β-catenin signaling. In a first step, WNT binding leads to ligand-induced association of FZD 5 and LRP6 (signal initiation) for both WNT-3A (top, red) and WNT−16B (bottom, blue). Upon higher-order receptor clustering and LRP6 phosphorylation, the signal is specified into WNT/β-catenin signaling (top, red). If these hallmarks are not met, the FZD-WNT complex can signal via other signaling pathways (bottom, blue). It is unclear whether LRP6 is involved in signal specification in that case. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/e80oa99 . Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.
Figure Legend Snippet: A Direct comparison of the effects of WNT-3A and WNT-16B as probed in this study. B Two-step model of signal initiation and specification in WNT/β-catenin signaling. In a first step, WNT binding leads to ligand-induced association of FZD 5 and LRP6 (signal initiation) for both WNT-3A (top, red) and WNT−16B (bottom, blue). Upon higher-order receptor clustering and LRP6 phosphorylation, the signal is specified into WNT/β-catenin signaling (top, red). If these hallmarks are not met, the FZD-WNT complex can signal via other signaling pathways (bottom, blue). It is unclear whether LRP6 is involved in signal specification in that case. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/e80oa99 . Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Techniques Used: Comparison, Binding Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Protein-Protein interactions



Similar Products

99
ATCC control vector pcdna 3 1
Control Vector Pcdna 3 1, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/control vector pcdna 3 1/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
control vector pcdna 3 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc lrp6
A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or <t>LRP6-Venus</t> with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.
Lrp6, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/lrp6/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
lrp6 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Addgene inc pcdna 3 1 plasmid
A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or <t>LRP6-Venus</t> with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.
Pcdna 3 1 Plasmid, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pcdna 3 1 plasmid/product/Addgene inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcdna 3 1 plasmid - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc v5 dest snap29 v5
a) HEK 293T cells expressing FLAG-STX17 were infected with different strains of Legionella for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A), followed by western blots with antibodies against FLAG, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were blotted with antibodies against FLAG and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. b) HEK 293T cells expressing <t>V5-SNAP29</t> were infected with different Legionella strains for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A) followed by western blotting with antibodies against V5, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against V5 and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. c) Domain architecture of STX17 and SNAP29 showing the PR-ubiquitination sites. d) A549 cells expressing GFP tagged STX17, STX17TM or the PR-Ub deficient mutant of STX17 were infected with Legionella strains for 2 h before fixation and immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody for analysis by confocal microscopy. Control cells were treated with 300 nM Torin-1 for 4 h. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI.Scale bar: 5µm. Scale bar in inset: 2µm. e) The number of STX17 + bacteria per cell were counted for ∼50 cells taken three different experiments. In the box-plots, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. N = 52, 56 cells taken from 3 experimental replicates. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p = 7.43E-8. Scale bar: 5µm. f) The formation of WT and PR-Ub-deficient SNAP29-GFP puncta was monitored in Legionella -infected cells 4 h post-infection. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. g) SNAP29 puncta were counted in 50-μm 2 regions of interest using FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. n >50 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, For the graph SNAP29 puncta/cell: *** p=6.82E-20. For the graph % cells with SNAP29 recruitment to bacteria: ***p = 2.27E-5(WT, SNAP29WT vs ΔS, SNAP29WT) ***p=2.56E-6 (WT, SNAP29WT vs WT, SNAP29mut. Scale bar: 5µm.
V5 Dest Snap29 V5, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/v5 dest snap29 v5/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
v5 dest snap29 v5 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Addgene inc 69821 rrid addgene 69821
a) HEK 293T cells expressing FLAG-STX17 were infected with different strains of Legionella for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A), followed by western blots with antibodies against FLAG, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were blotted with antibodies against FLAG and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. b) HEK 293T cells expressing <t>V5-SNAP29</t> were infected with different Legionella strains for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A) followed by western blotting with antibodies against V5, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against V5 and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. c) Domain architecture of STX17 and SNAP29 showing the PR-ubiquitination sites. d) A549 cells expressing GFP tagged STX17, STX17TM or the PR-Ub deficient mutant of STX17 were infected with Legionella strains for 2 h before fixation and immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody for analysis by confocal microscopy. Control cells were treated with 300 nM Torin-1 for 4 h. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI.Scale bar: 5µm. Scale bar in inset: 2µm. e) The number of STX17 + bacteria per cell were counted for ∼50 cells taken three different experiments. In the box-plots, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. N = 52, 56 cells taken from 3 experimental replicates. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p = 7.43E-8. Scale bar: 5µm. f) The formation of WT and PR-Ub-deficient SNAP29-GFP puncta was monitored in Legionella -infected cells 4 h post-infection. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. g) SNAP29 puncta were counted in 50-μm 2 regions of interest using FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. n >50 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, For the graph SNAP29 puncta/cell: *** p=6.82E-20. For the graph % cells with SNAP29 recruitment to bacteria: ***p = 2.27E-5(WT, SNAP29WT vs ΔS, SNAP29WT) ***p=2.56E-6 (WT, SNAP29WT vs WT, SNAP29mut. Scale bar: 5µm.
69821 Rrid Addgene 69821, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/69821 rrid addgene 69821/product/Addgene inc
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
69821 rrid addgene 69821 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Addgene inc pcdna 3
a) HEK 293T cells expressing FLAG-STX17 were infected with different strains of Legionella for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A), followed by western blots with antibodies against FLAG, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were blotted with antibodies against FLAG and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. b) HEK 293T cells expressing <t>V5-SNAP29</t> were infected with different Legionella strains for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A) followed by western blotting with antibodies against V5, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against V5 and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. c) Domain architecture of STX17 and SNAP29 showing the PR-ubiquitination sites. d) A549 cells expressing GFP tagged STX17, STX17TM or the PR-Ub deficient mutant of STX17 were infected with Legionella strains for 2 h before fixation and immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody for analysis by confocal microscopy. Control cells were treated with 300 nM Torin-1 for 4 h. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI.Scale bar: 5µm. Scale bar in inset: 2µm. e) The number of STX17 + bacteria per cell were counted for ∼50 cells taken three different experiments. In the box-plots, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. N = 52, 56 cells taken from 3 experimental replicates. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p = 7.43E-8. Scale bar: 5µm. f) The formation of WT and PR-Ub-deficient SNAP29-GFP puncta was monitored in Legionella -infected cells 4 h post-infection. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. g) SNAP29 puncta were counted in 50-μm 2 regions of interest using FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. n >50 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, For the graph SNAP29 puncta/cell: *** p=6.82E-20. For the graph % cells with SNAP29 recruitment to bacteria: ***p = 2.27E-5(WT, SNAP29WT vs ΔS, SNAP29WT) ***p=2.56E-6 (WT, SNAP29WT vs WT, SNAP29mut. Scale bar: 5µm.
Pcdna 3, supplied by Addgene inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/pcdna 3/product/Addgene inc
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
pcdna 3 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or LRP6-Venus with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Architecture of LRP-Venus and FZD-Nluc constructs. SP, signal peptide; FLAG, FLAG-tag; E1-E4, extracellular YWTD β-propeller/EGF domain repeats 1-4; LDL-A, low-density lipoprotein receptor type A repeats; TM, transmembrane domain; ICD, intracellular domain; CRD, cysteine-rich domain; 7TM, seven-transmembrane domain; C-term., receptor C-terminal domain. B Schematic depiction of the assay principle. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. https://BioRender.com/lfyvjb8 . C , D . WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) kinetics of HEK293 ( C ) or HEK293T ΔLRP5/6 ( D ) cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5/6-Venus (yellow and blue circles, respectively; note: y-axes are not scaling equal in all figure panels). E Stimulation of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP5- or LRP6-Venus with 1 nM of WNT surrogate. F WNT-3A stimulation (1000 ng/ml) of HEK293 cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and chimeric LRP5/6-Venus variants. G Architecture of LRP6 and LRP6-5A-Venus constructs. PPP(S/T)P/PPPAP, phosphorylation motifs. H. WNT-3A stimulation kinetics of HEK293A cells transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc and LRP6-/LRP6-5A-Venus (blue and light blue circles, respectively). Data are presented as mea n ± standard error of the mean (SEM) of five ( C ), four ( D ), or three ( E , F , H ) individual experiments, each performed in triplicate.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Construct, FLAG-tag, Transfection, Phospho-proteomics

A Schematic depiction of mutational paradigms. The FZD 5 R 6.32 A mutants preferentially signals in DVL-independent fashion. The DVL2 M2/M4 mutant cannot polymerize by its DIX domains. The DVL2 L445E mutant cannot engage FZD via its DEP domain. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/zfu7r84 . B ΔBRET traces of HEK293 cells transfected either with WT FZD 5 -Nluc or FZD 5 R 6.32 A-Nluc (dark and light blue circles, respectively) and LRP6-Venus, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. C ΔBRET traces of HEK293 and HEK293T ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (green and black circles), DVL2 (cyan and magenta), or DVL2-M2/M4 (dark cyan and purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. D ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL1 (green), DVL2 (magenta), or DVL3 (purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. E ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL2 (magenta), DVL2-M2/M4 (purple), DVL2-L445E (orange), or DVL2-M2/M4-L445E (red) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. F Scheme illustrating a proposed mechanism of DVL modulation of WNT-induced FZD 5 -LRP6 interaction. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/3gct1ez . Data are shown as mea n ± SEM of three (B – FZD 5 R 6.32 A, C – data with DVL2-M2/M4 co-expression D, E) or four (B – wt FZD 5 , C – all other data) individual experiments performed in triplicate. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Schematic depiction of mutational paradigms. The FZD 5 R 6.32 A mutants preferentially signals in DVL-independent fashion. The DVL2 M2/M4 mutant cannot polymerize by its DIX domains. The DVL2 L445E mutant cannot engage FZD via its DEP domain. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/zfu7r84 . B ΔBRET traces of HEK293 cells transfected either with WT FZD 5 -Nluc or FZD 5 R 6.32 A-Nluc (dark and light blue circles, respectively) and LRP6-Venus, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. C ΔBRET traces of HEK293 and HEK293T ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (green and black circles), DVL2 (cyan and magenta), or DVL2-M2/M4 (dark cyan and purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. D ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL1 (green), DVL2 (magenta), or DVL3 (purple) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. E ΔBRET traces of ΔDVL1-3 cells, transfected with FZD 5 -Nluc, LRP6-Venus and either pcDNA (black), DVL2 (magenta), DVL2-M2/M4 (purple), DVL2-L445E (orange), or DVL2-M2/M4-L445E (red) as indicated, stimulated with 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A. F Scheme illustrating a proposed mechanism of DVL modulation of WNT-induced FZD 5 -LRP6 interaction. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/3gct1ez . Data are shown as mea n ± SEM of three (B – FZD 5 R 6.32 A, C – data with DVL2-M2/M4 co-expression D, E) or four (B – wt FZD 5 , C – all other data) individual experiments performed in triplicate. Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Mutagenesis, Transfection, Expressing

A–D Kinetic ΔBRET traces of 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A ( A ), -5A ( B ), -10B ( C ), and -16B ( D ) at FZD 4,5,7 -Nluc (purple, red, and green, respectively) and LRP6-Venus. E Immunoblotting of phospho-LRP6, β-catenin, DVL2 and GAPDH (loading control) from whole cell lysates of HEK cells, stimulated for 2 h with 300 ng/ml of WNT-3A, -5A, -10B, and -16B or 1 nM surrogate WNT. The vehicle control (VC) was treated with HBSS and a CHAPS/EDTA mixture corresponding to that present in WNT preparations. F , G Densitometric analysis ( F , ratio of phospho-LRP6 (P-LRP6)/GAPDH; G , ratio of phosphorylated and shifted (PS-DVL2/DVL2) of blots shown in E. VC – black circle outlines, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. H . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 and HEK293T ΔFZD 1-10 cells overexpressing FZD 4/5/7 stimulated with diverse WNTs (300 ng/ml for 24 h) or WNT surrogate (1 nM for 24 h). The TOPFlash ratio is given as a fold-increase over vehicle control; statistical analysis was performed with one-way-ANOVA versus vehicle control for each transfection condition. WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. I . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 cells stimulated with R-spondin 1 (RSPO1; 100 ng/ml), WNT-3A (300 ng/ml), WNT-16B (300 ng/ml), and WNT-R-spondin 1 combinations for 24 h. Vehicle – black circle outlines, R-spondin 1 – blue-gray, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-16B – purple, WNT-3A + R-spondin 1 – light blue, WNT-16B + R-spondin 1 – pink. Statistical significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA using Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons against the vehicle control (reporter gene assay data was log 10 -transformed prior to statistical analysis). Data points are shown as mea n ± SEM of three individual experiments ( n = 4 in Fid. 2 C, D for FZD 5 data and in Fig. for FZD 7 TOPFlash data), performed in triplicate in case of BRET assays and reporter gene assays. Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A–D Kinetic ΔBRET traces of 1000 ng/ml WNT-3A ( A ), -5A ( B ), -10B ( C ), and -16B ( D ) at FZD 4,5,7 -Nluc (purple, red, and green, respectively) and LRP6-Venus. E Immunoblotting of phospho-LRP6, β-catenin, DVL2 and GAPDH (loading control) from whole cell lysates of HEK cells, stimulated for 2 h with 300 ng/ml of WNT-3A, -5A, -10B, and -16B or 1 nM surrogate WNT. The vehicle control (VC) was treated with HBSS and a CHAPS/EDTA mixture corresponding to that present in WNT preparations. F , G Densitometric analysis ( F , ratio of phospho-LRP6 (P-LRP6)/GAPDH; G , ratio of phosphorylated and shifted (PS-DVL2/DVL2) of blots shown in E. VC – black circle outlines, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. H . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 and HEK293T ΔFZD 1-10 cells overexpressing FZD 4/5/7 stimulated with diverse WNTs (300 ng/ml for 24 h) or WNT surrogate (1 nM for 24 h). The TOPFlash ratio is given as a fold-increase over vehicle control; statistical analysis was performed with one-way-ANOVA versus vehicle control for each transfection condition. WNT-3A – blue, WNT-5A – red, WNT-10B – dark teal, WNT-16B –purple, surrogate WNT – gray. I . TOPFlash reporter gene assays in HEK293 cells stimulated with R-spondin 1 (RSPO1; 100 ng/ml), WNT-3A (300 ng/ml), WNT-16B (300 ng/ml), and WNT-R-spondin 1 combinations for 24 h. Vehicle – black circle outlines, R-spondin 1 – blue-gray, WNT-3A – blue, WNT-16B – purple, WNT-3A + R-spondin 1 – light blue, WNT-16B + R-spondin 1 – pink. Statistical significance was assessed by a one-way ANOVA using Dunnett’s post hoc test for multiple comparisons against the vehicle control (reporter gene assay data was log 10 -transformed prior to statistical analysis). Data points are shown as mea n ± SEM of three individual experiments ( n = 4 in Fid. 2 C, D for FZD 5 data and in Fig. for FZD 7 TOPFlash data), performed in triplicate in case of BRET assays and reporter gene assays. Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Western Blot, Control, Transfection, Reporter Gene Assay, Transformation Assay

A . Representative single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (left) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (right). B . Single-molecule trajectory traces of SNAP-FZD 5 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 (green). C . Proportion of molecular confinement at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. D . Estimated k on (left) and k off (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6 interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. E . Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulated conditions. F . Representative, dual-color single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. G . Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. (C-E) Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n = 18, 25, 22, 17, 27, 25 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6 basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, WNT-16B early, WNT-16B late, and β 2 AR-LRP6, respectively, from six independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies - . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A . Representative single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (left) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (right). B . Single-molecule trajectory traces of SNAP-FZD 5 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 (green). C . Proportion of molecular confinement at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. D . Estimated k on (left) and k off (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6 interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations. Basal – black, WNT-3A early – light blue, WNT-3A late – blue, WNT-16B early – light purple, WNT-16B late – purple. E . Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulated conditions. F . Representative, dual-color single-molecule images showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6 molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. G . Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A and 100 nM WNT-16B stimulations at late time-point. (C-E) Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test. n = 18, 25, 22, 17, 27, 25 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6 basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, WNT-16B early, WNT-16B late, and β 2 AR-LRP6, respectively, from six independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies - . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Labeling, Diffusion-based Assay, Comparison

A Proportion of SNAP-FZD 5 and Halo-LRP6-5A molecular confinement at basal (black) and following 100 nM WNT-3A (early – light blue, late – dark blue) stimulation. B Representative, dual-color single-molecule image showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6-5A molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. C . Estimated kon (left) and koff (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6-5A interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation (early – light blue, late – dark blue). D Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A stimulated conditions. E Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. A , C , D Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test ( A , D ) and Mann-Whitney test C . n = 21, 26, 32 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6-5A basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, respectively, from three independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies – . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Proportion of SNAP-FZD 5 and Halo-LRP6-5A molecular confinement at basal (black) and following 100 nM WNT-3A (early – light blue, late – dark blue) stimulation. B Representative, dual-color single-molecule image showing SNAP-FZD 5 molecules, labeled with SNAP SiR-647 (magenta) and Halo-LRP6-5A molecules, labeled with Halo R110 (green) following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. C . Estimated kon (left) and koff (right) values of FZD 5 -LRP6-5A interactions at basal and following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation (early – light blue, late – dark blue). D Distributions of co-diffusion (blue) and co-confinement (red) events at basal and 100 nM WNT-3A stimulated conditions. E Cluster analysis showing the distributions of photobleaching steps following 100 nM WNT-3A stimulation at late time-point. A , C , D Data points are shown as median ± 95% confidence interval. Early stimulation: 2-10 min, late stimulation: 11-25 min. Statistical comparisons were made by Kruskal-Wallis followed by Dunn’s multiple comparison test ( A , D ) and Mann-Whitney test C . n = 21, 26, 32 cells for FZD 5 -LRP6-5A basal, WNT-3A early, WNT-3A late, respectively, from three independent experiments. See also Supp. Movies – . Exact p-values are detailed in the source data file.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Labeling, Diffusion-based Assay, Comparison, MANN-WHITNEY

A Direct comparison of the effects of WNT-3A and WNT-16B as probed in this study. B Two-step model of signal initiation and specification in WNT/β-catenin signaling. In a first step, WNT binding leads to ligand-induced association of FZD 5 and LRP6 (signal initiation) for both WNT-3A (top, red) and WNT−16B (bottom, blue). Upon higher-order receptor clustering and LRP6 phosphorylation, the signal is specified into WNT/β-catenin signaling (top, red). If these hallmarks are not met, the FZD-WNT complex can signal via other signaling pathways (bottom, blue). It is unclear whether LRP6 is involved in signal specification in that case. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/e80oa99 . Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: WNT-induced association of Frizzled and LRP6 is not sufficient for the initiation of WNT/β-catenin signaling

doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-60096-7

Figure Lengend Snippet: A Direct comparison of the effects of WNT-3A and WNT-16B as probed in this study. B Two-step model of signal initiation and specification in WNT/β-catenin signaling. In a first step, WNT binding leads to ligand-induced association of FZD 5 and LRP6 (signal initiation) for both WNT-3A (top, red) and WNT−16B (bottom, blue). Upon higher-order receptor clustering and LRP6 phosphorylation, the signal is specified into WNT/β-catenin signaling (top, red). If these hallmarks are not met, the FZD-WNT complex can signal via other signaling pathways (bottom, blue). It is unclear whether LRP6 is involved in signal specification in that case. Created in BioRender. Voss, J. (2025) https://BioRender.com/e80oa99 . Parts of this figure were created with BioRender.com released under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDrivs 4.0 International license.

Article Snippet: The template sequences for LRP5 and LRP6 were obtained from Addgene (#115907 and #27282, respectively) , .

Techniques: Comparison, Binding Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Protein-Protein interactions

a) HEK 293T cells expressing FLAG-STX17 were infected with different strains of Legionella for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A), followed by western blots with antibodies against FLAG, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were blotted with antibodies against FLAG and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. b) HEK 293T cells expressing V5-SNAP29 were infected with different Legionella strains for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A) followed by western blotting with antibodies against V5, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against V5 and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. c) Domain architecture of STX17 and SNAP29 showing the PR-ubiquitination sites. d) A549 cells expressing GFP tagged STX17, STX17TM or the PR-Ub deficient mutant of STX17 were infected with Legionella strains for 2 h before fixation and immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody for analysis by confocal microscopy. Control cells were treated with 300 nM Torin-1 for 4 h. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI.Scale bar: 5µm. Scale bar in inset: 2µm. e) The number of STX17 + bacteria per cell were counted for ∼50 cells taken three different experiments. In the box-plots, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. N = 52, 56 cells taken from 3 experimental replicates. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p = 7.43E-8. Scale bar: 5µm. f) The formation of WT and PR-Ub-deficient SNAP29-GFP puncta was monitored in Legionella -infected cells 4 h post-infection. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. g) SNAP29 puncta were counted in 50-μm 2 regions of interest using FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. n >50 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, For the graph SNAP29 puncta/cell: *** p=6.82E-20. For the graph % cells with SNAP29 recruitment to bacteria: ***p = 2.27E-5(WT, SNAP29WT vs ΔS, SNAP29WT) ***p=2.56E-6 (WT, SNAP29WT vs WT, SNAP29mut. Scale bar: 5µm.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Phosphoribosyl ubiquitination of SNARE proteins regulate autophagy in Legionella infection

doi: 10.1101/2025.05.19.654886

Figure Lengend Snippet: a) HEK 293T cells expressing FLAG-STX17 were infected with different strains of Legionella for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A), followed by western blots with antibodies against FLAG, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were blotted with antibodies against FLAG and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. b) HEK 293T cells expressing V5-SNAP29 were infected with different Legionella strains for 2 h. Lysates were used for GST pulldown with the DupA trapping mutant GST-DupA(H67A) followed by western blotting with antibodies against V5, GST and ubiquitin. Whole cell lysates were probed with antibodies against V5 and vinculin as a loading control. This experiment was repeated 3 times with similar results. c) Domain architecture of STX17 and SNAP29 showing the PR-ubiquitination sites. d) A549 cells expressing GFP tagged STX17, STX17TM or the PR-Ub deficient mutant of STX17 were infected with Legionella strains for 2 h before fixation and immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody for analysis by confocal microscopy. Control cells were treated with 300 nM Torin-1 for 4 h. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI.Scale bar: 5µm. Scale bar in inset: 2µm. e) The number of STX17 + bacteria per cell were counted for ∼50 cells taken three different experiments. In the box-plots, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25 th and 75 th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25 th and 75 th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. N = 52, 56 cells taken from 3 experimental replicates. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p = 7.43E-8. Scale bar: 5µm. f) The formation of WT and PR-Ub-deficient SNAP29-GFP puncta was monitored in Legionella -infected cells 4 h post-infection. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. g) SNAP29 puncta were counted in 50-μm 2 regions of interest using FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles. n >50 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, For the graph SNAP29 puncta/cell: *** p=6.82E-20. For the graph % cells with SNAP29 recruitment to bacteria: ***p = 2.27E-5(WT, SNAP29WT vs ΔS, SNAP29WT) ***p=2.56E-6 (WT, SNAP29WT vs WT, SNAP29mut. Scale bar: 5µm.

Article Snippet: FLAG-STX17 was a gift from Noboru Mizushima (Addgene #45911; RRID Addgene_45911) and pcDNA 3.2/V5-DEST SNAP29-V5 was a gift from Anne Brunet (Addgene #69821; RRID Addgene_69821).

Techniques: Expressing, Infection, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Ubiquitin Proteomics, Control, Immunostaining, Confocal Microscopy, Bacteria, Software

a) A549 cells were treated with control or STX17 siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT Legionella . Cells were fixed and stained for indicated autophagy markers 1 h after infection. The data are means ± SEM of 50 cells representing three experiments. which were analyzed per sample to quantitate recruitment of FIP200 and ATG14L to bacteria. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p=5.83E-7(FIP200), ***p=1.92E-12(ATG14L), Scale bar: 5µm. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. b) A549 cells were treated with STX17 or control siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT or ΔS Legionella for 12 h (MOI = 1). Cells were fixed for immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody followed by confocal microscopy. The LCV size was estimated in FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. n = 32, 31 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p =8.13E-16. Scale bar: 5µm. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. c) A549 cells were treated with control or STX17 siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT or ΔS Legionella . Intracellular bacterial replication was assessed after 0, 24 and 48 h. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test, **p =0.00526 (WT, control vs STX17siRNA, 24h), **p =0.00815 (WT, control vs STX17siRNA, 48h), d) A549 cells were treated with STX17 or control siRNA for 48 h followed by transfection with WT or PR-Ub-deficient STX17 for 24 h. Intracellular bacterial replication was assessed after 0, 24 and 48 h. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments **p=0.0077 (WT, STX17siRNA versus STX17 mutant, STX17siRNA, 48 h).Western blotting with STX17 antibody shows knockdown efficiency of STX17 siRNA and reconstitution with WT or mutant STX17. e) Proximity labeling assay workflow. HeLa cells expressing doxycycline-inducible APEX-STX17 and CD32(for increasing efficiency of Legionella uptake) were infected with Legionella for 2 h before treatment with biotin-tyramide and H 2 O 2 followed by streptavidin pulldown. The samples were reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin before MS analysis. Samples representing three biological replicates each of non-infected and Legionella -infected cells were analyzed in a single reaction by 6plex TMT labeling. f) Volcano plot showing changes in the biotin-labeled proteome following the infection of HeLa cells expressing APEX2-FLAG-STX17 with ΔR and ΔRΔS Legionella for 2 h, GO analysis of the biotin-labeled proteome showing pathways upregulated by infection with ΔR vs ΔRΔS Legionella . Data represents mean fold change of three experimental replicates per infection set (n=3). p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test and significant candidates were chosen having p-value ≤0.01 and log2(fold change) value minimum of ±0.5. Red and green indicate compartments containing proteins enriched following infection with ΔR and ΔRΔS Legionella , respectively. g) Cells expressing doxycycline-inducible APEX-STX17 were infected with Legionella for 2 h before treatment with biotin-tyramide and H 2 O 2 followed by streptavidin pulldown. The samples were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against proteins of the autophagic and endosomal pathways. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. WT vs ΔS p values: *p= 0.01006 (FIP200), **p=0.0206 (ULK1), p=***0.0007 (ATG13) **p=0.005 (ATG14), *p=0.0111(Beclin1), *p=0.0219 (WIPI2), **p=0.0038 (ATG5), *p=0.018 (ATG12), **p=0.001 (ATG16), **p=0.0036 (VAMP8), *p=0.0424 (SNAP29). (n.i-not infected, WT-wild-type Legionella , ΔS-ΔSidE Legionella )

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Phosphoribosyl ubiquitination of SNARE proteins regulate autophagy in Legionella infection

doi: 10.1101/2025.05.19.654886

Figure Lengend Snippet: a) A549 cells were treated with control or STX17 siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT Legionella . Cells were fixed and stained for indicated autophagy markers 1 h after infection. The data are means ± SEM of 50 cells representing three experiments. which were analyzed per sample to quantitate recruitment of FIP200 and ATG14L to bacteria. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p=5.83E-7(FIP200), ***p=1.92E-12(ATG14L), Scale bar: 5µm. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. b) A549 cells were treated with STX17 or control siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT or ΔS Legionella for 12 h (MOI = 1). Cells were fixed for immunostaining with a Legionella -specific antibody followed by confocal microscopy. The LCV size was estimated in FIJI. In the box-plot, center lines show the medians; box limits indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles as determined by R software; whiskers extend 1.5 times the interquartile range from the 25th and 75th percentiles, outliers are represented by dots. n = 32, 31 cells taken from 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed, type 3 Student’s t-test, ***p =8.13E-16. Scale bar: 5µm. Dotted lines indicate cell outlines drawn from thresholding images in FIJI. c) A549 cells were treated with control or STX17 siRNA for 48 h followed by infection with WT or ΔS Legionella . Intracellular bacterial replication was assessed after 0, 24 and 48 h. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test, **p =0.00526 (WT, control vs STX17siRNA, 24h), **p =0.00815 (WT, control vs STX17siRNA, 48h), d) A549 cells were treated with STX17 or control siRNA for 48 h followed by transfection with WT or PR-Ub-deficient STX17 for 24 h. Intracellular bacterial replication was assessed after 0, 24 and 48 h. Data are means ± SEM of three independent experiments **p=0.0077 (WT, STX17siRNA versus STX17 mutant, STX17siRNA, 48 h).Western blotting with STX17 antibody shows knockdown efficiency of STX17 siRNA and reconstitution with WT or mutant STX17. e) Proximity labeling assay workflow. HeLa cells expressing doxycycline-inducible APEX-STX17 and CD32(for increasing efficiency of Legionella uptake) were infected with Legionella for 2 h before treatment with biotin-tyramide and H 2 O 2 followed by streptavidin pulldown. The samples were reduced, alkylated and digested with trypsin before MS analysis. Samples representing three biological replicates each of non-infected and Legionella -infected cells were analyzed in a single reaction by 6plex TMT labeling. f) Volcano plot showing changes in the biotin-labeled proteome following the infection of HeLa cells expressing APEX2-FLAG-STX17 with ΔR and ΔRΔS Legionella for 2 h, GO analysis of the biotin-labeled proteome showing pathways upregulated by infection with ΔR vs ΔRΔS Legionella . Data represents mean fold change of three experimental replicates per infection set (n=3). p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Student’s t-test and significant candidates were chosen having p-value ≤0.01 and log2(fold change) value minimum of ±0.5. Red and green indicate compartments containing proteins enriched following infection with ΔR and ΔRΔS Legionella , respectively. g) Cells expressing doxycycline-inducible APEX-STX17 were infected with Legionella for 2 h before treatment with biotin-tyramide and H 2 O 2 followed by streptavidin pulldown. The samples were analyzed by western blot with antibodies against proteins of the autophagic and endosomal pathways. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. WT vs ΔS p values: *p= 0.01006 (FIP200), **p=0.0206 (ULK1), p=***0.0007 (ATG13) **p=0.005 (ATG14), *p=0.0111(Beclin1), *p=0.0219 (WIPI2), **p=0.0038 (ATG5), *p=0.018 (ATG12), **p=0.001 (ATG16), **p=0.0036 (VAMP8), *p=0.0424 (SNAP29). (n.i-not infected, WT-wild-type Legionella , ΔS-ΔSidE Legionella )

Article Snippet: FLAG-STX17 was a gift from Noboru Mizushima (Addgene #45911; RRID Addgene_45911) and pcDNA 3.2/V5-DEST SNAP29-V5 was a gift from Anne Brunet (Addgene #69821; RRID Addgene_69821).

Techniques: Control, Infection, Staining, Bacteria, Immunostaining, Confocal Microscopy, Software, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Western Blot, Knockdown, Labeling, Expressing

a) PR-Ub (PDB ID: 5M93) was manually attached to residue S63 of SNAP29 in the structure of the STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 complex (7BV6) using Pymol. b) Schematic showing the formation of the autophagosomal SNARE complex, and the effect of PR-ub on its formation. c) Untagged SNAP29 and STX17-GST was purified from E. coli and incubated with His-tagged Ub in an in vitro PR-ub assay. PR-Ub modified STX17 and SNAP29 were enriched by nickel-NTA based affinity purification and incubated with 100ug protein lysate from HEK293T cells. This was followed by GST-pulldown of STX17 and antibody-based immunoprecipitation of SNAP29 to check for alterations in protein-protein interactions upon PR-Ub. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test 0.001 < **p ≤ 0.01).**p=0.004 (VAMP8), **p=0.001 (ATG14L), **p=0.022 (PR-Ub STX17). d) WT and PR-Ub modified SNAP29 were incubated with equimolar amounts of purified GST-STX17, VAMP8 and ATG14L. Interactors of PR-Ub modified SNAP29 were observed by immunoblotting. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.0068 (STX17), **p=0.0059 (VAMP8). e) WT or PR-Ub modified GST-STX17 were incubated with equimolar amounts of purified GST-STX17, VAMP8 and ATG14L. Interactors of PR-Ub modified STX17 were observed by immunoblotting. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.042 (ATG14L), **p=0.029 (SNAP29). f) WT or PR-Ub modified forms of both STX17 and SNAP29 were incubated with VAMP8 and ATG14L followed by immunoprecipitation of GST-STX17 and immunoblotting to check for protein-protein interactions. Pure proteins were run as the reaction inputs and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.0208 (ATG14L), **p=0.023 (VAMP8), ***p=0.00046 (SNAP29). g) Schematic showing the effect of PR-Ub of STX17 and SNAP29 on bacterial vacuole formation. PR-Ub of STX17 enhances interactions with ATG14L which results in the recruitment of ER membranes to the bacterial vacuole.PR-Ub of SNAP29 prevents fusion of the STX17 positive vacuoles with the VAMP8 positive lysosomes.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: Phosphoribosyl ubiquitination of SNARE proteins regulate autophagy in Legionella infection

doi: 10.1101/2025.05.19.654886

Figure Lengend Snippet: a) PR-Ub (PDB ID: 5M93) was manually attached to residue S63 of SNAP29 in the structure of the STX17-SNAP29-VAMP8 complex (7BV6) using Pymol. b) Schematic showing the formation of the autophagosomal SNARE complex, and the effect of PR-ub on its formation. c) Untagged SNAP29 and STX17-GST was purified from E. coli and incubated with His-tagged Ub in an in vitro PR-ub assay. PR-Ub modified STX17 and SNAP29 were enriched by nickel-NTA based affinity purification and incubated with 100ug protein lysate from HEK293T cells. This was followed by GST-pulldown of STX17 and antibody-based immunoprecipitation of SNAP29 to check for alterations in protein-protein interactions upon PR-Ub. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test 0.001 < **p ≤ 0.01).**p=0.004 (VAMP8), **p=0.001 (ATG14L), **p=0.022 (PR-Ub STX17). d) WT and PR-Ub modified SNAP29 were incubated with equimolar amounts of purified GST-STX17, VAMP8 and ATG14L. Interactors of PR-Ub modified SNAP29 were observed by immunoblotting. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.0068 (STX17), **p=0.0059 (VAMP8). e) WT or PR-Ub modified GST-STX17 were incubated with equimolar amounts of purified GST-STX17, VAMP8 and ATG14L. Interactors of PR-Ub modified STX17 were observed by immunoblotting. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.042 (ATG14L), **p=0.029 (SNAP29). f) WT or PR-Ub modified forms of both STX17 and SNAP29 were incubated with VAMP8 and ATG14L followed by immunoprecipitation of GST-STX17 and immunoblotting to check for protein-protein interactions. Pure proteins were run as the reaction inputs and immunoblotted with indicated antibodies. The data represents means ± SD of 3 independent experiments. p value was calculated using 2 tailed type 3 Students t-test. **p=0.0208 (ATG14L), **p=0.023 (VAMP8), ***p=0.00046 (SNAP29). g) Schematic showing the effect of PR-Ub of STX17 and SNAP29 on bacterial vacuole formation. PR-Ub of STX17 enhances interactions with ATG14L which results in the recruitment of ER membranes to the bacterial vacuole.PR-Ub of SNAP29 prevents fusion of the STX17 positive vacuoles with the VAMP8 positive lysosomes.

Article Snippet: FLAG-STX17 was a gift from Noboru Mizushima (Addgene #45911; RRID Addgene_45911) and pcDNA 3.2/V5-DEST SNAP29-V5 was a gift from Anne Brunet (Addgene #69821; RRID Addgene_69821).

Techniques: Residue, Purification, Incubation, In Vitro, Modification, Affinity Purification, Immunoprecipitation, Protein-Protein interactions, Western Blot